1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 49 Wn.2d
  5. 49 Wn.2d 123 (1956)
 

SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO. v. GRANT

No. 33470.

49 Wn.2d 123 (1956)

298 P.2d 497

SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. THEODORE GRANT, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

June 14, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harley W. Allen, for appellant.

Casey & Johnson, for respondent.

HILL, J.

In an action by Sears, Roebuck and Company, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Sears), to recover possession of certain crop sprinkling equipment or its value, the defendant, Theodore Grant (formerly Theodore Gruzdis), made a counterclaim for damages for the loss of a forty-acre wheat crop. Grant claimed that delay in the delivery of 320 feet of two-inch aluminum pipe necessary as laterals in the operation of his sprinkling system caused the loss of the crop...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases