1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 92 S.E.2d
  5. 92 S.E.2d 78 (1956)
 

WHITFIELD v. CAROLINA HOUSING & MORTGAGE CORP.

No. 166.

92 S.E.2d 78 (1956)

243 N.C. 658

Chadbourn WHITFIELD and wife, Rosa Whitfield, v. CAROLINA HOUSING & MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Jefferson E. Owens, Trustee, and Consolidated Roofing Company.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 21, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carr & Swails, Charlotte, for defendants-appellants.

Solomon B. Sternberger and Hewlett & Williams, Wilmington, for plaintiffs-appellees.

PARKER, Justice.

The defendant Consolidated Roofing Company did not appeal.

The brief of the appellants has no reference anywhere to any ground of exception or any assignment of error. This brief states two questions are involved: One, was there sufficient evidence of nonnegotiability of the promissory note involved in this action to justify submission of the issues to the jury? Two, was there sufficient evidence to support the verdict? The brief concludes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases