SWIFT v. FAIRYLAND PARK


2 Misc.2d 155 (1956)

Maureen Swift, Respondent, v. Fairyland Park, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

March 9, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin Evans for appellant.

Samuel G. Rabinor, Herman Rosenberg and Arthur Venitt for respondent.


Per Curiam.

The verdict of "not guilty in the operation of the merry-go-round" coupled with an award of damages to the plaintiff was clearly inconsistent. The jury was thoroughly confused. This is readily evident from its original verdict and eventual inability to reach any verdict in the case. While the verdict might have been corrected if the intent was sufficiently clear (Selig v. Alexander, 185 App. Div...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases