1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 139 Cal.App.2d
  5. 139 Cal.App.2d 10 (1956)
 

CITY & COUNTY OF S.F. v. BUDDE

Docket No. 16671.

139 Cal.App.2d 10 (1956)

292 P.2d 955

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Appellant, v. HENRY J. BUDDE et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

February 2, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, George E. Baglin and Patrick R. Kelly, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, Miriam E. Wolff and Robert L. Berman, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondents.

NOURSE, P.J.

Plaintiff sued the members of the Board of State Harbor Commissioners on a complaint which has some of the features of an action for declaratory relief, some of those of a mandatory injunction, and some of those of a prohibitory injunction. The defendants answered denying some of the pleaded facts and made a separate plea that the complaint did not state a cause of action.

At the conclusion of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases