Per Curiam.
Respondent, an attorney admitted to practice in this State since 1931, is charged with professional misconduct. The evidence adduced before the Referee amply supports the conclusion that respondent converted moneys, the property of his clients, to his own use. It was also established that respondent was continuously and grossly neglectful of the professional duty owed to clients. He repeatedly failed to render services promised and callously misled...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.