LEHMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

Nos. 362-364, Docket 23989-23991.

234 F.2d 958 (1956)

Ruth Lamar LEHMAN, Petitioner, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McGuigan & Kilcullen, New York City (Richard Kilcullen, New York City, of counsel), for petitioner on review.

Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Charles Freeman, Lee A. Jackson, Harry Baum and David O. Walter, Washington, D. C., Attorneys, Department of Justice, of counsel), for respondent.

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, New York City (Leslie M. Rapp and David G. Sacks, New York City, of counsel), for Robert Lehman, amicus curiæ.

Before MEDINA, LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The opinion of the Tax Court, Docket Numbers 49981, 49982 and 49983, reported at 14 T.C.M. 928, is affirmed. Robert Lehman, 17 T.C. 652

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases