1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 42 N.J.
  5. 42 N.J. Super. 75 (1956)
 

ZELL v. BOROUGH OF ROSELAND

42 N.J. Super. 75 (1956)

125 A.2d 890

ALICE SWAIN ZELL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF ROSELAND, THE HALF DIME SAVINGS BANK, THE ROSELAND METHODIST PROTESTANT CHURCH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 15, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Roy J. Grimley argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants.

Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Roseland, et al.; Messrs. Brandley & Brandley and Mr. Walter G. Brandley, attorneys for The Roseland Methodist Protestant Church, et al.; Messrs. Riker, Emery & Danzig, Mr. Irving Riker and Mr. Dickinson R. Debevoise, attorneys for The Half Dime Savings Bank).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, J.A.D.

This action was brought by residents and property owners of Roseland in the Law Division to review an ordinance adopted July 12, 1955 amending the zoning ordinance of the Borough of Roseland originally adopted May 13, 1952. The basis of our determination of this appeal leaves it unnecessary to discuss the factual background in detail. It will suffice to summarize. The general effect of the amendment is a revision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases