1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 229 F.2d
  5. 229 F.2d 926 (1956)
 

CHICAGO RIVER & INDIANA R. CO. v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAIL. T.

No. 11474.

229 F.2d 926 (1956)

The CHICAGO RIVER AND INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD TRAINMEN et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied March 5, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Walter J. Cummings, Jr., Marvin A. Jersild, Chicago, Ill., Kenneth F. Burgess, Wayne M. Hoffman, William K. Bachelder, Chicago, Ill., Sidley, Austin, Burgess & Smith, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for appellants.

Edward B. Henslee, William C. Wines, Martin K. Henslee, John J. Naughton, Chicago, Ill., for appellees.

Before FINNEGAN, LINDLEY and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges.

SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judge.

By amended complaint the Chicago River and Indiana Railroad Company1 and 27 other railroads prayed for an injunction to restrain the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen2 from calling a threatened strike against the River Road. Trainmen's counsel state that the purpose of said strike is to settle 21 grievances and claims through collective bargaining rather than by an award of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases