1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 41 N.J.
  5. 41 N.J. Super. 74 (1956)
 

VAN CORP. v. MAYOR & COUNCIL OF BOR. OF RIDGEFIELD

41 N.J. Super. 74 (1956)

124 A.2d 48

THE VAN CORPORATION AND STILLMAN & HOAG, INC., CORPORATIONS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF RIDGEFIELD, AND JAMES LAURIA, BUILDING INSPECTOR, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 13, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for appellants.

Mr. Abram A. Lebson argued the cause for respondents (Messrs Lebson & Prigoff, attorneys).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and CONFORD.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GOLDMANN, S.J.A.D.

Defendants appeal from a Law Division judgment which held that the prohibition of the Borough of Ridgefield zoning ordinance against used car lots in a D business district did not apply to the sale of used cars by plaintiff Stillman & Hoag, Inc., "as an adjunct and part of their business of selling new cars" upon the premises in question.

Plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases