1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 239 F.2d
  5. 239 F.2d 885 (1956)
 

SCHLESSING v. UNITED STATES

No. 14802.

239 F.2d 885 (1956)

A. SCHLESSING, claimant of 75 articles of device, more or less, designated as "The Schlessing Ultrasoniseur," together with their labeling, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

September 24, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Smith, Van Dyke & Hildreth, Spencer E. Van Dyke, Jack E. Hildreth, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.

Laughlin E. Waters, U. S. Atty., Max F. Deutz, Asst. U. S. Atty., Arthur A. Dickerman, Atty., Dept. of Health, Education & Welfare, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.

Before STEPHENS and FEE, Circuit Judges, and FOLEY, District Judge.

JAMES ALGER FEE, Circuit Judge.

This is a review of the denial of a motion by Schlessing to compel administrative approval of a method of distributing certain devices designated as "The Schlessing Ultrasoniseur" in the manner proposed by him. All these devices had been condemned in an action for the seizure of seventy-five of these devices prosecuted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. The six Ultrasoniseurs here in question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases