PER CURIAM.
Appellant, hereinafter referred to as defendant, having served the first of two consecutive sentences imposed upon him in 1951, assails the validity of the second and contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to vacate that sentence under Title 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
The details of defendant's offenses are set out in the opinion of this court affirming
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.