LINDEMAN v. TEXTRON, INCORPORATED


143 F.Supp. 955 (1956)

Victor D. LINDEMAN, Francis Bonner, Katherine Robinson Brainard as Executrix of the Estate of Millard Brainard, Deceased, and Lincoln Epworth, Plaintiffs, v. TEXTRON, INCORPORATED, Defendant.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

July 25, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Day, Epworth, Plaskow & Lawrence, New York City, for plaintiffs. Milton Pollack, New York City, of counsel.

Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, for defendant.


REEVES, District Judge.

Invoking the provisions of Rule 50(b) and Rule 59(a), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., the defendant through its able counsel seeks a directed verdict in favor of the defendant notwithstanding the verdict of the jury, and, failing in that, to obtain a new trial under Rule 59(a) supra, on the grounds of multiple errors committed in the trial of the cause.

The various contentions of the defendant will be noted and briefly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases