AUSTIN v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

No. 12811.

235 F.2d 836 (1956)

Phillip W. AUSTIN, Appellant, v. The MUNICIPAL COURT for the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and the Judges thereof, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided June 21, 1956.

Petition for Rehearing Denied August 7, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Philip W. Austin, Washington, D. C., appellant, pro se.

Mr. Milton D. Korman, Asst. Corp. Counsel for the District of Columbia, with whom Mr. Vernon E. West, Corp. Counsel, Mr. Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, and Mr. Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, for appellees.

Before PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.


Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied August 7, 1956.

PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Austin brought a civil action in the District Court praying an injunction restraining the judges of the Municipal Court from "debarring" him from practice before that court and praying that the District Court declare Rule 75 of the Municipal Court illegal as without authority of law. The District Court dismissed the complaint.

Austin is now and has been for many...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases