Per Curiam.
It was error to exclude oral testimony as to the rent paid for the housing accommodations in question on the date when residential rents were "frozen" by law. Evidence of this nature is admissible when the maximum rent is in dispute. (See Matter of Haynes v. Abrams,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.