FREIDUS v. MENDEZ


4 Misc.2d 1048 (1956)

Israel Freidus, Appellant, v. "John" Mendez, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department.

October 11, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ralph E. Freidus for appellant.

No appearance for respondent.

HART, ARKWRIGHT and BROWN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

It was error to exclude oral testimony as to the rent paid for the housing accommodations in question on the date when residential rents were "frozen" by law. Evidence of this nature is admissible when the maximum rent is in dispute. (See Matter of Haynes v. Abrams, 1 A.D.2d 583; Kalwar v. McKinnon, 152 F.2d 263; Acevedo v. Syrian Prot. Church,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases