Order unanimously affirmed, without costs.
There is no evidence that the ordinance in question deprives the owner of the beneficial use of the land, nor any showing of such urgent business need as to render unsuitable and unprofitable use of the property for residence purposes. There is no showing by competent testimony of such reduction in value of the land as to constitute confiscation; nor is there any evidence of discrimination. The question involved is a debatable...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
