1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 91 S.E.2d
  5. 91 S.E.2d 916 (1956)
 

DAVIS v. BLANKENSHIP

No. 240.

91 S.E.2d 916 (1956)

243 N.C. 693

Mrs. Margaret Skinner DAVIS v. M. B. BLANKENSHIP and Ben M. Blankenship and others, t/d b a Blankenship Brothers, and Otis Gooding, Original Defendants, and Edward C. Davis, Jr., Additional Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 21, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Helms & Mulliss, William H. Bobbitt, Jr., John D. Hicks, Charlotte, for original defendants.

Kennedy, Kennedy & Hickman, Charlotte, for additional defendant.

PER CURIAM.

A careful consideration of the exceptions and assignments of error brought forward and discussed in the appellants' brief leads us to the conclusion that no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown. Hence, in the trial below we find no error.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases