CAHILL v. PHILADELPHIA


381 Pa. 611 (1955)

Cahill, Appellant, v. Philadelphia.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

May 23, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert G. Kelly, with him William R. Deasey and Kelly, Deasey & Scanlan, for appellant.

Abraham Wernick, Deputy City Solicitor, with him Mitchell S. Lipschutz, Assistant City Solicitor, Jerome J. Shestack, First Deputy City Solicitor and Abraham L. Freedman, City Solicitor, for appellees.

Before STERN, C.J., STEARNE, JONES, BELL, CHIDSEY, MUSMANNO and ARNOLD, JJ.


OPINION BY MR. CHIEF JUSTICE HORACE STERN, May 23, 1955:

Plaintiff is the proprietor of a restaurant, holds a retail liquor license, and sells alcoholic beverages to his patrons. He brought the present action in equity, on behalf of himself and all others similarly engaged in Philadelphia, to restrain the City from applying its mercantile license tax to receipts from the sale of liquors. The court below dismissed the complaint.

Acting under the authority of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases