HANDELMAN v. PEABODY


285 A.D. 689 (1955)

Philip Handelman, Appellant-Respondent, v. Stephen Peabody, Respondent-Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 10, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene J. Keogh of counsel (Thomas P. Dougherty with him on the brief; Halpin, Keogh & St. John, attorneys), for plaintiff-appellant-respondent.

Thomas I. Sheridan, Jr., of counsel (Louis Flato with him on the brief; Hartman, Sheridan & Tekulsky, attorneys), for defendant-respondent-appellant.

PECK, P. J., COHN, CALLAHAN, BASTOW and BOTEIN, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The order and judgment appealed from should be reversed and the motion for summary judgment denied, with costs to defendant-appellant. There were triable issues as to the fee arrangements and payments between plaintiff and his client in the matrimonial litigation and as to whether the services rendered by plaintiff to the wife in that litigation were necessary services for which the defendant is responsible...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases