1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 229 F.2d
  5. 229 F.2d 739 (1955)
 

HUBER v. HUBER

No. 12384.

229 F.2d 739 (1955)

John E. HUBER, Appellant, v. Byrd S. HUBER, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

November 7, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Long & Bloom, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant.

Henry A. Burgett, Burke & Cooney, Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, MILLER, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The above cause came on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and argument of counsel in open court. Appellant contends that the district court rendered its judgment upon an agreed statement of facts to which appellant was not a party. The proofs, however, justified the conclusion that the material facts, as set forth in the above mentioned statement of facts, were approved...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases