CITY & COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO v. ROSS

Docket No. S.F. 18982.

44 Cal.2d 52 (1955)

279 P.2d 529

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Petitioner, v. HARRY D. ROSS, as City and County Controller, etc., Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 3, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dion R. Holm, City Attorney, and John Elmer Barricklo, Deputy City Attorney for Petitioner.

Jesse H. Steinhart, B.J. Feigenbaum, John H. Steinhart and Joseph J. Carter, for Respondent.


SHENK, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. The alternative writ issued. The respondent Harry D. Ross is the controller of the petitioning city and county and upon request refused to certify to the availability of funds in the city's off-street parking bond fund for the acquisition by eminent domain of a proposed off-street parking garage site between Ellis and O'Farrell Streets in downtown San Francisco. By this proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases