HUFFORD v. CICOVICH

No. 33256.

47 Wn.2d 905 (1955)

290 P.2d 709

CHARLES HUFFORD et al., Appellants, v. GEORGE B. CICOVICH, Respondent. PACIFIC OUTFITTING COMPANY, Appellant, v. GEORGE B. CICOVICH, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two.

November 25, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clarke, Clarke & Albertson and Daniel B. Trefethen, Jr., for appellants.

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester, Earle W. Zinn, and Murray & Murray, for respondent.


HILL, J.

This is a smoke damage case. Plaintiffs Charles Hufford and wife operated an apparel store in Tacoma, and plaintiff Pacific Outfitting Company, a corporation, operated another such store. Both stores fronted on Broadway in a building which extends from that street to Commerce street, the entrances to the stores on Broadway being on a considerably higher level than the Commerce street entrances. The defendant, George B. Cicovich, operated a restaurant and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases