1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 220 F.2d
  5. 220 F.2d 721 (1955)
 

BAKER v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD CO.

Nos. 15127, 15128.

220 F.2d 721 (1955)

Robert N. BAKER, Cross-Claimant — Appellant. v. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant. v. Robert N. BAKER, Cross-Claimant — Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

April 7, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. McCracken, Davenport, Iowa, for Robert N. Baker.

J. C. Pryor, Burlington, Iowa (John Hale and Larned Waterman, Davenport, Iowa, on the brief), for Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co.

Before GARDNER, Chief Judge, and COLLET and VAN OOSTERHOUT, Circuit Judges.

GARDNER, Chief Judge.

Initially this action was brought by Rose E. Petsel as executrix of the estate of R. D. Petsel, her deceased husband, against the Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Company and Robert N. Baker to recover damages for the death of her husband, R. D. Petsel, by reason of the alleged wrongful acts of the named defendants. Her action as against Robert N. Baker was, however, dismissed and Robert N. Baker filed a cross-complaint against the Chicago...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases