KATT v. STURTEVANT


269 Wis. 638 (1955)

KATT, Respondent, vs. VILLAGE OF STURTEVANT and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 3, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by L. D. Potter of Racine.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by William W. Storms of Racine.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendants contend that summary judgment should not have been granted because the pleadings and affidavits in the record raise substantial issues of fact to be tried. The complaint did allege that prior to and on the 17th day of November, 1953, plaintiff owned and maintained on his property a total of 22 mink. This was denied in the answer. If the plaintiff were claiming to be exempt from the operation of the ordinance under the provisions of section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases