SHANIK v. SHANIK


207 Misc. 685 (1955)

Rosalind Shanik, Plaintiff, v. Daniel Shanik, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County.

February 21, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harry Gittleson for defendant.

Sidney H. Bishop for plaintiff.


COLDEN, J.

Motion by defendant for a bill of particulars. Plaintiff argues that a bill is not required in a matrimonial action where the complaint alleges a general course of conduct, citing Earle v. Earle (79 App. Div. 631, opinion in 79 N.Y.S. 613, 614) and Loeb v. Loeb (240 App. Div. 912). In the Earle case, the pleading set forth "many particulars of the cruel and inhuman treatment upon...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases