WILLIAMS v. SMELT


83 So.2d 1 (1955)

Hugh Emmet WILLIAMS, Appellant, v. Frank Arthur SMELT, William Catlin, William Catlin, Jr., Bertha M. Catlin and S. Marshall Catlin, Individually and as co-partners, trading and doing business as William Catlin & Sons, and Clarence M. Steinman, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Florida. Division B.

Rehearing Denied November 14, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Osborne, Copp & Markham and J. Henson Markham, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Jack F. Wayman, Marks, Gray, Yates & Conroy and Francis P. Conroy, Jacksonville, for Frank Arthur Smelt.

Howell & Kirby and Thos. Malcolm Kirby, Jacksonville, for William Catlin, William Catlin, Jr., S. Marshall Catlin, Bertha M. Catlin and Clarence M. Steinman, appellees.


THORNAL, Justice.

Appellant Williams, one of a group of defendants in an automobile negligence case, appeals from a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee Smelt, the plaintiff below, naming also as appellees Steinman and Catlin, who were co-defendants below but who received a favorable verdict of the jury at the trial.

Smelt filed a complaint for personal injuries and property damage against Williams, Steinman and Catlin. The injury allegedly occurred when...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases