PRINCETON v. PUBLIC SERVICE COMM.


268 Wis. 542 (1955)

CITY OF PRINCETON and others, Appellants, vs. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 1, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by R. W. Peterson of Madison.

For the respondent Public Service Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and William E. Torkelson, chief counsel for the commission, and oral argument by Mr. Torkelson.

For the respondent Chicago & North Western Railway Company there was a brief by E. H. Borgelt and J. R. Walker, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Borgelt.


STEINLE, J.

The appellants' challenge is directed principally to the Public Service Commission's findings of ultimate facts and to the order.

It appears from the findings of evidentiary facts that the railroad company experienced a substantial financial loss in the operation of the passenger trains in question during the test period, October, 1952, to September, 1953. Its revenues for that period (exclusive of the dependent revenues which were estimated at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases