BRIGGS v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RY. CO.

No. 36,421.

243 Minn. 566 (1955)

JAMES E. BRIGGS v. CHICAGO GREAT WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 11, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene A. Rerat, Harry H. Peterson, and Plunkett & Plunkett, for relator.

Grannis & Grannis, Catherwood, Hughes & Alderson, and Glenn E. Kelly, for respondent.


MATSON, JUSTICE.

Plaintiff seeks to review and vacate a nonappealable order by mandamus.

This matter arises pursuant to an order directing the trial court to show cause why a peremptory writ of mandamus should not issue commanding it to vacate an order granting a new trial, or in the alternative, if mandamus for that purpose is denied, requiring the trial court to vacate said order and to make a new order based exclusively on evidence presented to the jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases