1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 130 Cal.App.2d
  5. 130 Cal.App.2d 672 (1955)
 

SUMNER v. FLOWERS

Docket No. 20178.

130 Cal.App.2d 672 (1955)

279 P.2d 772

B. ALLAN SUMNER et al., Appellants, v. G.E. FLOWERS et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 11, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles J. Katz and William B. Murrish for Appellants.

Charles H. Carr and Harold M. Williams for Respondents.

MOORE, P.J.

The question posed is whether parol evidence may be received to show that a signatory to a contract was in fact the agent of a fully disclosed principal.

Appellants Sumner and Farber and respondent Furnish, prior to August 11, 1941, were associated on the staff of Madison Hospital, Los Angeles. Sumner was a business administrator, Farber an osteopathic doctor, and Furnish, a medical physician. After lengthy consultation, the three men

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases