1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 130 F.Supp.
  5. 130 F.Supp. 640 (1955)
 

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & H. R. CO. v. BALTIMORE & O. R. CO.

No. 19567.

130 F.Supp. 640 (1955)

NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN & HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY, Libellant, v. The BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

May 3, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward R. Brumley, New York City, for libellant, R. M. Peet, New York City, of counsel.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston, New York City, for respondent, Donald M. Waesche, Jr., New York City, of counsel.

GALSTON, District Judge.

Libellant seeks to recover damages to one of its carfloats incurred as a result of a collision with a carfloat of respondent on October 19, 1947 in the East River.

Libellant's tug, Transfer No. 15, left the vicinity of the float bridges of the Central Railroad Company of New Jersey in Jersey City about 5:20 a. m. on the 19th of October, bound for Oak Point (near 149th Street in the Bronx) with Carfloat No. 58 in tow on her starboard...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases