PROUTY v. DRAKE


208 Misc. 540 (1955)

Lee F. Prouty, Plaintiff, v. Nathaniel Drake, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

August 30, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

T. Newman Lawler, Felix H. Kent and William J. Marlow for defendant.

Lewis S. Bowdish for plaintiff.


MATTHEW M. LEVY, J.

The plaintiff, now a resident of California, sues the defendant, now a resident of New York. In her complaint she alleges the following in substance: The plaintiff and the defendant were domiciled and married in New Jersey, and they continued their domicile there after marriage. Thereafter, the plaintiff sued the defendant in New Jersey for divorce upon the ground of adultery. By written stipulation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases