GOFORTH v. SCOGGINS

35799.

92 Ga. App. 648 (1955)

89 S.E.2d 569

GOFORTH et al. v. SCOGGINS et al.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 30, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Woodruff, Swift & Stephens, for plaintiffs in error.

J. Norwood Jones, Jr., contra.


GARDNER, P. J.

From the evidence introduced, it is unquestionable that the automobile claimed by the plaintiffs is the same automobile found in the possession of the defendants and claimed by them. The only question to be determined is whether or not the description in the conditional bill of sale, recorded in Fulton County, is sufficient to give the defendants constructive notice that the automobile found in their possession was the same automobile

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases