1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 162 Ohio
  5. 162 Ohio St. 569 (1955)
 

FOX v. IND. COM.

Nos. 33990 and 34018.

162 Ohio St. 569 (1955)

FOX, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. SCHIELE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 23, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Thomas F. Joseph, Mr. Harold E. Gottlieb and Mr. James F. DeLeone, for appellant in case No. 33990.

Mr. A. Millard Armstrong, for appellant in case No. 34018.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, Mr. Paul Tague, Jr., and Mr. James L. Young, for appellee.

HART, J.

The principal question to be determined in both cases is: Where, in a hearing on a workmen's compensation claim, a hypothetical question is propounded to a medical witness for the purpose of establishing causal connection between an accidental injury and succeeding harm or disability, may such question inquire as to "a causal relationship" or must it inquire as to "a direct or proximate causal relationship...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases