1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 130 Cal.App.2d
  5. 130 Cal.App.2d 595 (1955)
 

ARTHUR v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

Docket No. 20482.

130 Cal.App.2d 595 (1955)

279 P.2d 68

MARIE ARTHUR, Respondent, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 4, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger Arnebergh, City Attorney, Bourke Jones, Assistant City Attorney, Edwin F. Shinn and Weldon L. Weber, Deputy City Attorneys, for Appellant.

Marie Arthur, in pro. per., for Respondent.

FOX, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting plaintiff's motion for a new trial after verdict and judgment thereon for the city. The motion was "granted upon the ground of insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict and judgment." It is the city's position that "there is no evidence from which any inference may be drawn that there was any negligence in the operation of the police car" involved in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases