DRIVER v. CITY OF TULSA

No. 36536.

292 P.2d 426 (1955)

Thad A. DRIVER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. CITY OF TULSA et al., Defendants in Error.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Rehearing Denied January 30, 1956.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Doerner, Rinehart & Stuart, Jack E. Campbell, Tulsa, for plaintiffs in error.

T.A. Landrith, Jr., City Atty., Edmund Lashley, Asst. City Atty., for city of Tulsa.

Carlson, Lupardus, Matthews, Holliman & Huffman, Tulsa, for Standard Paving Company.


WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

The City of Tulsa, a municipal corporation, through its certain officers, adopted a resolution for the purpose of creating Street Improvement District No. 1413, and providing for the improvement by grading, paving, guttering and draining of certain portions of designated streets in the area of the improvement district; said improvements to be paid for by assessments against property abutting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases