CLARK v. UNITED STATES

No. 14176.

221 F.2d 480 (1955)

Roger Dean CLARK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

April 13, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. B. Tietz, Los Angeles, Cal., Hayden C. Covington, Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellant.

Lloyd H. Burke, U. S. Atty., Richard H. Foster, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges, and YANKWICH, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

Appellee seeks a rehearing asserting that the decision of the Supreme Court in Witmer v. United States on March 14, 1955, 75 S.Ct. 392, requires a decision contrary to our previous judgment herein.

We find no resemblance between this case and the Witmer case. The Witmer case, like our cases of White v. United States, 9 Cir., 215 F.2d 782, and Tomlinson v. United States, 9 Cir., 216 F.2d 12

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases