OLEET v. PENNSYLVANIA EXCH. BANK


285 A.D. 411 (1955)

Harold K. Oleet et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business under the Name of Harold K. Oleet & Bros., Respondents, v. Pennsylvania Exchange Bank, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

February 15, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bernard Weiss of counsel (Dorff & Levy, attorneys), for appellant.

Irving Conrad Shadlen for respondents.

PECK, P. J., COHN and BASTOW, JJ., concur.


BREITEL, J.

Defendant bank appeals from denial of its motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint for legal insufficiency. It is sued by its former borrowers on two causes of action. The first is to recover twice the amount of usurious interest allegedly paid by plaintiffs to defendant bank. The second cause of action, apparently, is for fraud based upon the bank's false...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases