Judgment reversed, with costs, and a new trial granted.
The court found as a fact that respondent and appellant "came to an oral agreement for the joint undertaking of a refuse collection business in the City of New York." The first conclusion of law that respondent is the sole owner of the business is inconsistent with this finding, and neither it nor the judgment is supported by the other findings. Consequently the judgment cannot stand. (Dougherty v. Lion Fire...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
