1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 205 Or.
  5. 205 Or. 465 (1955)
 

THOM v. LIARD ET AL

205 Or. 465 (1955)

289 P.2d 418

THOM v. LIARD ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed November 9, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank E. Day argued the cause for appellant. On the brief were Stern, Reiter & Day of Portland.

Wendell Wyatt argued the cause for respondent, Elizabeth U. Liard. On the brief were Norblad, Wyatt & Macdonald of Astoria.

No appearance was made nor brief filed by respondent The First Seaside Bank.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and TOOZE, ROSSMAN and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PERRY, J.

This is a suit for the partition of the following described real property, to-wit:

"Lot Two (2), Block Seven (7), Inglenook Addition to the City of Seaside, Clatsop County, Oregon."

The defendant The First Seaside Bank has not appealed and, therefore, when we speak of the "defendant" in this opinion we are referring to Elizabeth U. Liard.

Prior to September 26, 1952, Azellus Liard and the defendant Elizabeth U...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases