FRANKLAND v. PETERSON


268 Wis. 394 (1955)

FRANKLAND, Respondent, vs. PETERSON and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 11, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Eastman, Rose & Faller and Norman B. Langill, all of Marinette, and oral argument by John E. Faller.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Emmet McCarthy of Marinette.


BROWN, J.

Sec. 85.16, Stats., provides:

"RULES FOR PASSING. (1) Signals for passing. The operator of an overtaking motor vehicle not within a business or residence district shall give audible warning with his warning device before passing or attempting to pass a vehicle proceeding in the same direction."

To comply with the purpose of the statute the warning must be given in volume and at a time and place sufficient to inform a driver reasonably...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases