1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 139 F.Supp.
  5. 139 F.Supp. 514 (1955)
 

LAVDAS v. HOLLAND

Civ. A. No. 19538.

139 F.Supp. 514 (1955)

Aristoteles LAVDAS v. John W. HOLLAND, District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service.

United States District Court E. D. Pennsylvania.

Judgment Affirmed July 11, 1956.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rappaport & Lagakos, Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

W. Wilson White, U. S. Atty., Norman C. Henss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

(1) I think that the rationale of the decision of the Supreme Court in Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48, 75 S.Ct. 591, 98 L.Ed. 868, leads, in this case, to the conclusion that neither the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization nor the Attorney General is an indispensable party in a proceeding of this nature and that the petition for a judicial review and permanent restraining order, naming the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases