1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 268 Wis.
  5. 268 Wis. 382 (1955)
 

RUCINSKI v. KUEHL

268 Wis. 382 (1955)

RUCINSKI (Veronica), Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. KUEHL, Defendant: MINNESOTA FARMERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant: RUCINSKI (Joseph) and another, Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

January 11, 1995.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Graves & Chambers of Wisconsin Rapids, and oral argument by R. B. Graves.

For the respondents Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Company and Joseph Rucinski there was a brief and oral argument by M. S. King of Wisconsin Rapids.

For the respondent Veronica Rucinski there was oral argument by Richard S. Brazeau of Wisconsin Rapids.

MARTIN, J.

Appellant served no notice of appeal upon Kuehl. Plaintiff and defendants Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Company and Joseph Rucinski move this court for dismissal of the appeal on the ground of noncompliance with sec. 274.11 (1), Stats., which provides for appeals to the supreme court as follows:

"An appeal is taken by serving a notice of appeal signed by the appellant or his attorney on each party adverse to him upon the appeal who...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases