HIZEL v. HIZEL

No. 17701.

288 P.2d 354 (1955)

Murrell Collins HIZEL, Plaintiff in Error, v. Carl HIZEL, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

Rehearing Denied October 24, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur W. Burke, Jr., George K. Thomas, Denver, for plaintiff in error.

Kripke & McLean, Denver, for defendant in error.


HOLLAND, Justice.

Defendant in error, as plaintiff, about five months after his marriage to defendant, now plaintiff in error, filed an action for divorce on the grounds of cruelty.

We are constantly disturbed in being compelled to study the record in many cases filed in this court to determine the inaccuracies found therein, and to check loose and careless statements of counsel concerning the record. The record herein presents an example. The first page discloses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases