HALE v. CHATHAM

35549.

91 Ga. App. 519 (1955)

86 S.E.2d 536

HALE v. CHATHAM.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided February 25, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fraser & Shelfer, for plaintiff in error.

Wright, Oxford & Love, Clifford Oxford, contra.


TOWNSEND, J.

An action brought by a real-estate broker to recover damages for breach of an alleged contract for commissions is subject to general demurrer when it fails to allege that the broker has fully complied with the license laws of this State. (Regarding the necessity for license, see Code § 84-1413.) It is immaterial whether the point was argued and considered in the trial court or not. Cline v.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases