1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 35 N.J.
  5. 35 N.J. Super. 555 (1955)
 

STATE v. HOAG

35 N.J. Super. 555 (1955)

114 A.2d 573

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM HOAG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 2, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Jacob Schneider argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. William J. Arnold argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Guy W. Calissi, Bergen County Prosecutor, Mr. William C. Brudnick, Special Assistant Prosecutor, on the brief).

Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

The defendant has been permitted to prosecute the present appeal as an indigent person. R.R. 1:2-7; 2:2-5. By reason of that circumstance the factual structure upon which the defendant's points of appeal are to be considered is in the form of a statement of facts to which counsel for the defendant and for the State have subscribed and upon which the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases