In this automobile personal injuries case, counsel for appellant argued carefully and capably that the judgment is contrary to the weight of the evidence and to the Pennsylvania incontrovertible physical facts rule. We think that under the evidence these matters were for the jury and the trial court. With reference to the form of the verdict, the error, if any, was unsubstantial.
The judgment of the district...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.