LEGACY v. CLAROSTAT MFG. CO.

No. 4412.

99 N.H. 483 (1955)

WILFRED H. LEGACY, JR. v. CLAROSTAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY & a.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

Decided June 30, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Upton, Sanders & Upton (Mr. Richard F. Upton orally), for the plaintiff.

McLane, Carleton, Graf, Greene & Brown and Wesley E. Whitney (Mr. Whitney orally), for the defendant Clarostat Manufacturing Company.

James M. Riley, Edward F. Smith and Winslow H. Osborne (Mr. Riley orally), for the defendant State of New Hampshire.


BLANDIN, J.

The parties agree that the issue here is whether a stoppage of work due to a labor dispute caused the plaintiff's unemployment, and that if it did, he cannot recover under R. L., c. 218, s. 4 D, as amended, even though the strike ended some weeks before he returned to work. The question must be determined upon the facts before us in the light of general principles of causation. Much confusion has arisen in the law on this subject, chiefly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases