1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 36 N.J.
  5. 36 N.J. Super. 506 (1955)
 

STATE v. NEWMAN

36 N.J. Super. 506 (1955)

116 A.2d 585

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PAUL NEWMAN, PAUL NEWMAN AND AMIDIO BERMUDEZ, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 23, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Michael Breitkopf argued the cause for the defendants-appellants (Mr. Arthur J. Breitkopf, attorney).

Mr. Robert O. Brokaw, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. Leon Gerofsky, Prosecutor of Somerset County, attorney).

Before Judges CONFORD, SULLIVAN and KNIGHT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KNIGHT, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

Defendants were charged with being disorderly persons and were convicted in the municipal court. Their appeals were dismissed by the County Court for failure to perfect said appeals in accordance with the provisions of R.R. 3:10-2 and R.R. 3:10-8. The propriety of the dismissals is the subject of this appeal.

Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases