1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 46 Wn.2d
  5. 46 Wn.2d 494 (1955)
 

VIKINGSTAD v. BAGGOTT

No. 33050.

46 Wn.2d 494 (1955)

282 P.2d 824

GEORGE VIKINGSTAD, Respondent, v. HAROLD E. BAGGOTT et al., Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, Department One.

April 21, 1955.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malcolm J. Bell, for appellants.

Ferguson & Burdell and W. Wesselhoeft, for respondent.

FINLEY, J.

This is an action by respondent to recover money from appellants on the basis of an alleged contract between appellants and one Morton E. Lang (not a party to this action), whereby appellant Harold E. Baggott promised Lang that he would pay respondent one thousand dollars. It is quite evident that respondent's complaint is framed to state a cause of action on the theory that he is a third-party donee beneficiary of the above-mentioned contract,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases