NORDLING v. JOHNSTON


205 Or. 315 (1955)

283 P.2d 994

287 P.2d 420

NORDLING v. JOHNSTON

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed as modified May 18, 1955.

Petition for rehearing denied September 14, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warde H. Erwin argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Boyd & Erwin, Portland.

Sidney I. Lezak, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Peterson and Pozzi, Portland.

Before WARNER, Chief Justice, and LUSK, BRAND and LATOURETTE, Justices.


AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.

LUSK, J.

This action was brought, pursuant to statute, to recover wages, a penalty, and attorney's fees. ORS 652.140; Oregon Laws 1947, ch 193 (ORS 652.150); OCLA § 102-607 (ORS 652.200). From a judgment for plaintiff based on a verdict of the jury the defendant has appealed.

The plaintiff alleged in his complaint that between June 5 and June 12, 1950, defendant employed the plaintiff, Walter Newman and John Jacobsen as ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases