STATE EX REL. BRILL v. SPIEKER


271 Wis. 237 (1955)

STATE EX REL. BRILL, Plaintiff in error, vs. SPIEKER, Defendant in error.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 8, 1955.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the plaintiff in error there was a brief by Baumblatt & Goodman, and oral argument by Leonard P. Baumblatt and Marvin Shovers, all of Racine.

For the defendant in error there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, Dexter D. Black, district attorney of Racine county, and Edward A. Krenzke, special assistant district attorney, and oral argument by Mr. Platz and Mr. Krenzke.


MARTIN, J.

Appellant states the first question involved as follows:

Can the state upon a preliminary hearing be compelled to produce an exhibit previously offered in evidence on a John Doe hearing, to show the innocence of the defendant?

It is conceded that:

"Where a person is detained pursuant to the order of the court made upon a preliminary examination, the only question raised by a writ of habeas corpus is, `Was there any evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases